Foreskin Restoration / Intactivism Network

Go Back   Foreskin Restoration / Intactivism Network > FORESKIN RESTORATION > Safe Haven
Register FAQ Members List Calendars Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Safe Haven Disrespect for religious views is not permitted.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 27th, 2011
Dasher Dasher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,012
Default Should convicted felons speak for Christians?

Remember Chuck Colson? He was one of Nixon's Watergate criminals, and did time in the big house after being convicted.

Now Chuck is fighting for the right of Christians to circumcise their boys, just like the Jews. He's on the same team as a certain Catholic archbishop (who should know better) and all kinds of Evangelical Protestants.

Here's the story:

http://www.christianpost.com/news/ci...d-smith-51642/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 28th, 2011
intact intact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 828
Default Re: Should convicted felons speak for Christians?

What about my religious freedom to circ my girls?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 28th, 2011
Nuruu's Avatar
Nuruu Nuruu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 55
Default Re: Should convicted felons speak for Christians?

-=facepalm=-
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 28th, 2011
Barthos01's Avatar
Barthos01 Barthos01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 100
Default Re: Should convicted felons speak for Christians?

"circumcision avails not in the eyes of God"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 21st, 2011
TheRifleman TheRifleman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 303
Default Re: Should convicted felons speak for Christians?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dasher View Post
Remember Chuck Colson? He was one of Nixon's Watergate criminals, and did time in the big house after being convicted.

Now Chuck is fighting for the right of Christians to circumcise their boys, just like the Jews. He's on the same team as a certain Catholic archbishop (who should know better) and all kinds of Evangelical Protestants.

Here's the story:

http://www.christianpost.com/news/ci...d-smith-51642/
I am very displeased with Chuck Colson's statements.

I generally observe the old saying, "I do not discuss politics or religion," and will try to stick to it posting here.

While I do belive that many evengelical Christians present a great problem to us Intactivists, we should remember what Van Lewis said, probably late in his ife, hat we Intactivists do not have any way of knowing how someone might react to Intactivistm, simply on the basis of what religion or political beliefs they might have.

I'm sure there are many evangelical Christians who are very horrified by, and opposed to cutting baby boys, and would never do it to their sons, and probably do want legal protection from mutilation extended to male as well as female unconsenting minors.

I think what is needed is for a well recognized, prominent evangelical to speak out in favor of Intactivism, which would really benefit our cause.

I'm sure ther are prominent evangelical leaders who are intact, and if they would come out of the closet and say so, their followers would see that it is good for males to be left intact.

I've often wondered if Dr. Billy Graham is intact?

If he, or some other evangelical as prominent would speak out and say they are intact, and are opposed to cutting boys, I believe that many of their followers would react favorably.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.